Eugenie Chapelle vs Liv Drolshammer Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W L L W
Form
L W W L L W L L L LH2H: Chapelle 1 - 0 Drolshammer
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chapelle winning 2 and Drolshammer winning 1. The last match between Chapelle and Drolshammer was at the Hammamet, 28-04-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Eugenie Chapelle getting the victory 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eugenie Chapelle | 1 |
| Liv Drolshammer | 0 |
Hammamet(28-04-2018)
4
6
7
6
6
1
| Chapelle | Stats | Drolshammer |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 29 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 46% (44-52) | Career Total W/L | 25% (3-9) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Chapelle VS Drolshammer H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | |||||
Chapelle VS Drolshammer H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eugenie Chapelle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Reka Farbas
Player
Eugenie Chapelle
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
81%
(
46 of
57)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Irigoyen
Player
Eugenie Chapelle
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
view more
Liv Drolshammer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Petia Arshinkova
Player
Liv Drolshammer
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marketa Panackova
Player
Liv Drolshammer
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
13
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (44/52) | Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 48% (102/109) | Sets Win/Loss | 30% (8/19) |
| 49% (883/902) | Games Win/Loss | 39% (90/138) |
| 48% (12/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (31/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 2 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 483 | Average Opponent Rank | 221.92 |
| 74% (314/427) | 1st Serve % | 58% (71/122) |
| 51% (159/314) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (32/71) |
| 34% (38/113) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (13/51) |
| 50% (27/54) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (5/17) |
| 47% (197/417) | Return Points Win % | 43% (48/111) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 47% (43/48) | Futures W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 47% (43/91) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 43% (10/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 82% (44/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 18% (44/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 15% (52/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (9/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
